Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Joseph, 916 So. 2d 378.

23 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Evelyn M. Miller La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
    App. 3 Cir. 11/2/05), (approvingly citing State v. Joseph, supra).
  • State of Louisiana v. Morgan E. Douglas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), this court discussed remanding a case for a restitution hearing stating: In Assignment of Error number 3, the defendant argues that when the case is remanded for resentencing, a hearing should be held, during which the parties should be given an opportunity to present evidence concern
  • State v. Joseph 215 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Darrell Kennedy Mallette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • State v. Mallette 193 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State of Louisiana v. William Shupp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3d Cir.11/02/05), (convictions for armed robbery and aggravated burglary violated double jeopardy).
  • State v. Shupp 185 So. 3d 900 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    See State v. Rabun, 38,655 (La.App.2d Cir.08/18/04), (convictions for armed robbery and conspiracy to commit armed robbery violated double jeopardy); (convictions for first degree murder and armed robbery when armed robbery was the underlying offense violated double jeopardy); State v. Joseph, 2005-186 (La.App.3d Cir.11/02/05), (convictions for armed robbery and aggravated burglary violated double jeopardy).
  • State v. Baxley 139 So. 3d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3d Cir.11/02/05), (convictions for armed robbery and aggravated burglary violated double jeopardy).
  • State of Louisiana v. Hung Nguyen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Nguyen 55 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    3d Cir.11/02/05), (convictions for armed robbery and aggravated burglary violated double jeopardy).
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory P. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), we vacated an armed robbery conviction on the basis that the defendant had also been convicted of aggravated burglary, where at trial, the same evidence would have been used to secure both convictions.
  • State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/05) , , we vacated an armed robbery conviction on the basis that the defendant had also been convicted of aggravated burglary, where at trial, the same evidence would have been used to secure both convictions.
  • State of Louisiana v. John Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), this court reversed the defendant’s conviction for the armed robbery of Irma Dartez because of a double jeopardy violation.1 That sentence was vacated.
  • State v. Joseph 982 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 11/2/05) , , this court reversed the defendant's conviction for the armed robbery of Irma Dartez because of a double jeopardy violation.
  • State v. Fussell 974 So. 2d 1223 La. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. J. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), this court stated: This court has held that when a trial court fails to state the amount of restitution owed as a condition of probation, the sentence is illegal and the case must be remanded for resentencing.
  • State v. JM 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), , this court stated: This court has held that when a trial court fails to state the amount of restitution owed as a condition of probation, the sentence is illegal and the case must be remanded for resentencing.
  • State v. J.M. 941 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. 11/2/05), , this court stated: This court has held that when a trial court fails to state the amount of restitution owed as a condition of probation, the sentence is illegal and the case must be remanded for resentencing.
  • State of Louisiana v. Leon D. Fussell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Fussell 941 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006