Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Warren, 949 So. 2d 1215.

60 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Clayton W. Rector La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    2/22/07), -30 (footnote omitted), the supreme court discussed searches incident to arrest as follows: In Thornton v. United States, 541 U.S. 615, 124 S.Ct.
  • State v. Simmons 996 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 9 (La.2/22/07), .
  • State v. Jarrell 994 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Warren, 05-2248, p. 6 (La.2/22/07), -22 .
  • State v. Berry 989 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In determining whether sufficient exigent circumstances exist to justify the warrantless entry and search or seizure, the court must "consider the totality of the circumstances and the `inherent necessities of the situation at the time.'" (citing United States v. Rohrig, 98 F.3d 1506 (6th Cir. 1996)).
  • State v. Chatman 981 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Warren, 2005-2248 (La.02/22/07), -1226 .
  • State of Louisiana v. Kimberly M. Scallion La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Scallion 976 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), .
  • State v. James 975 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    2127 , 158 L.Ed.2d 905 (2004); State v. Canezaro, 07-668 (La.06/01/07), ; State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.02/22/07), .
  • State v. Jones 970 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    See: State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), .
  • State v. Parnell 960 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    art. 703(D); State v. Warren, 05-2248 (La.2/22/07), ; State v. Brown, 04-882, p. 4 (La.App.