Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pinion, 968 So. 2d 131.

57 citing documents.

  • State v. Franklin 996 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Pinion, 2006-2346 (La.10/26/07), ; State v. Fairley, 25,951 (La.App.
  • State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    10/26/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that it had never established an absolute rule as to whether bench conferences had to be recorded as per La.
  • State v. Cheatteam 986 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Pinion, 06-2346 (La.10/26/07), -35 (per curiam) (Citations omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that "the failure to record bench conferences will ordinarily not affect the direct review process when the record suggests that the unrecorded bench conferences had no discernible impact on the proceedings and did not result in any specif
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy G. Falcucci La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    10/26/07), where the supreme court held that the court reporter’s failure to adequately record the bench conferences in which the state and defendant made challenges for cause and exercised their peremptory challenges prejudiced the defendant’s appeal.
  • State v. Falcucci 982 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    |10In support of his argument, the Defendant refers this court to State v. Pinion, 06-2346 (La.10/26/07), , where the supreme court held that the court reporter’s failure to adequately record the bench conferences in which the state and defendant made challenges for cause and exercised their peremptory challenges prejudiced the defendant’s appeal.
  • State v. O'NEAL 976 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    537 , 169 L.Ed.2d 377 , and State v. Pinion, 2006-2346 (La.10/26/07), , for the proposition that he is entitled to a new trial because the failure to preserve these demonstrations for the record prejudices him on appeal.
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    In State v. Pinion, 2006-2346 (La.10/26/07), , the record contained neither transcript of the bench conferences nor any documentation showing which jurors were challenged for cause by the defense or stricken by the defense with peremptory challenges.