Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Vance, 947 So. 2d 105.

21 citing documents.

State v. Humbles 169 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Rivera 134 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Cox 131 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Walker 128 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Deweese 128 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), ; State v. Upchurch, 00-1290 (La.App.
State v. Williams 119 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
*238 App. 5 Cir. 11/28/06), , 109 writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Morales 125 So. 3d 1141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) ; , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07); .
State v. Williams 106 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) ; , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07); .
State v. Smith 106 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) ; , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07); .
State v. Hubbard 103 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Gibson 103 So. 3d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , writ denied, 2007-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Bannister 88 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06), , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Welch 87 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/28/06), , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Cummings 79 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , n. 3 , writ denied 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), , this Court found under similar circumstances in an armed robbery case that it was not necessary to remand for resentencing, as only individuals actually sentenced to death or confinement at hard labor shall be confined to the Department of Corrections.
State v. England 38 So. 3d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 11/28/06), , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. England 38 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 11/28/06), , 109 n. 3, writ denied, 07-0152 (La.9/28/07), .
State v. Savoie 15 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , this Court found under similar circumstances that it was not necessary to remand for re-sentencing, as only individuals actually sentenced to death or confinement at hard labor shall be confined to the Department of Corrections.
State v. Office 967 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 11/28/06) , , the court held a seventy-five-year sentence for armed robbery was not excessive.
State of Louisiana v. Frederick James Collette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 11/28/06), State v. Gipson, 41,549 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon J. Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 11/28/06), the court held a seventy-five-year sentence for armed robbery was not excessive.