Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lauff, 953 So. 2d 813.

36 citing documents.

David C. Flettrich, a Professional Engineering Corporation v. Dudley Debosier, a Professional Law Corporation La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
App. 5 Cir. 2/13/07), ).
State of Louisiana Versus George Cepriano, Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Jontreal A. Fisher La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 5 Cir. 2/13/07), , 819.
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
State of Louisiana v. Derrick Walker Stafford -Aka- Derrick Stafford La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5 Cir. 2/13/07), the fifth circuit stated: Both the Louisiana Supreme Court and this Court have consistently held that a motion to quash is, essentially, a mechanism to urge pre-trial pleas, i.e. pleas which do not go to the merits of the charge.
State v. Stafford 241 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5 Cir. 2/13/07), , 818, the fifth circuit stated: Both the Louisiana Supreme Court and this Court have consistently held that a motion to quash is, essentially, a mechanism to urge pre-trial pleas, i.e. pleas which do not go to the merits of the charge.
State v. Bradstreet 196 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Wilson 142 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 2/13/07) , ; State v. Fernandez, 03-987, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Ohlsson 115 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Belcher 113 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5th Cir.2/13/07), , our sister circuit held that the defendant’s motion to quash was improper because she raised factual matters that related to the merits of the case, relating solely to the issue of defendant’s guilt, in that the defendant | ^contended the state’s evidence could not prove she had the requisite intent for murder beyon
State v. Lirette 102 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Robinson 87 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Flores 66 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Caulfield 67 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Fox 43 So. 3d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 2/13/07), , the reviewing court, relying in part upon Billard, supra, upheld the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to quash, stating: In the present case, defendant raised no issue regarding the sufficiency of the indictment.
State v. Harrell 40 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Milton 40 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Knight 34 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Campbell 28 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
In Re Ellzey 9 So. 3d 839 La. 2009
In re: Ellzey, 07-0729 (La.4/12/07), .
State v. Caffrey 15 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 2/13/07), ; State v. Fernandez, 03-987, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Holmes 10 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Johnson 3 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Robertson 995 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Young 988 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Decay 989 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson 986 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Trevino 985 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Robinson 984 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 2/13/07), , citing State v. Fernandez, 03-987, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Arceneaux 983 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
App. 5 Cir. 2/13/07), (citations omitted).
State v. Anderson 979 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 2/13/07), , this Court noted that "[r]estating an assigned error in brief without argument or citation of authority does not constitute briefing."
State v. Marie 973 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Williams 970 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007