Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite PRIME INCOME ASSET MANAGEMENT v. Tauzin, 981 So. 2d 897.

23 citing documents.

Vernon A. Valentino, M.D. v. Heart and Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
See also Prime Income Asset Mgmt., Inc. v. Tauzin, 07-1380 (La.App 3 Cir. 4/30/08)
Valentino v. Heart & Vascular Associates of Acadiana, P.C. 221 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See also Prime Income Asset Mgmt., Inc. v. Tauzin, 07-1380 (La.App 3 Cir. 4/30/08), .
Kim A. Guillory v. Christus Health Central Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Guillory v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 219 So. 3d 1115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Marie M. Coburn v. Janis Dixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 4/30/08), -06, this court held: The provision for adequate discovery does not grant a party an absolute right to delay a decision on a motion for summary judgment until all discovery is complete.
Coburn v. Dixon 190 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , -06 , this court held: ' The.
Teen Town Productions, L.L.C. v. Scurlock 182 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Paris Madison v. State of La, Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Madison v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections 164 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
3 *385 Cir. 4/30/08) , -06 .
Louis Fox, Et Ux. v. the Shaw Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Fox v. Shaw Group 106 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Raymond Alex, Sr. v. Bnsf Railway Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 4/30/08), -06, holding that additional discovery was not warranted when the plaintiff had over a year to engage in same, stated: The provision for adequate discovery does not grant a party an absolute right to delay a decision on a motion for summary judgment until all discovery is complete.
City of Alexandria v. Ratcliff Construction Company, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 4/30/08), -06, discussed a similar situation: Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 966(A)(1) provides that a defendant is able to move for summary judgment “at any time.” Further, La.Code Civ.P.
City of Alexandria v. Ratcliffe Construction Co., LLC 95 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 4/30/08) , -06 , discussed a similar situation: Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 966(A)(1) provides that a defendant is able to move for summary judgment “at any time.” Further, La.Code Civ.P.
Johnnie Thomas Gunter v. Jefferson Davis Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Gunter v. Jefferson Davis Parish 84 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Sharon Lecroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 17 4/30/08), -06.
LeCroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital 56 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Stream Family Ltd. Partnership v. Marathon Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Stream Family Ltd. Partnership v. Marathon Oil Co. 27 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
COTTINGIM v. Vliet 19 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Castelle M. Andrus La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA v. Andrus 10 So. 3d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009