State v. Holland
State v. Holland, 970 So. 2d 1268 (La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007).
Cited by
- Kenneth Duplechain v. Firooz Jalili La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Duplechain v. Jalili 52 So. 3d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Miller v. Conagra, Inc. 991 So. 2d 445 La. 2008
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Holland 970 So. 2d 1263
Opinion text
970 So.2d 1268 (2007) STATE of Louisiana v. Paul S. HOLLAND. No. 07-696. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. December 5, 2007. John F. DeRosier, District Attorney, Carla S. Sigler, Assistant District Attorney, Lake Charles, LA, for State of Louisiana. Walter M. Sanchez, Lorenzi, Sanchez & Barnatt, LLP, Lake Charles, LA, for Defendant/Appellant Paul S. Holland. Court composed of MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, GLENN B. GREMILLION, and BILLY HOWARD EZELL, Judges. SULLIVAN, Judge. For the reasons assigned in State v. Holland, 07-695 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/5/07) , 970 So.2d 1263 , 2007 WL 4245701 , Defendant's sentences are affirmed; however, the sentences are amended to reflect that he is not eligible for diminution of sentence pursuant to La.R.S. 15:537. This matter is remanded and the trial court is instructed to note the amendment in the court minutes. Further, the trial court is ordered to correct the court minutes to reflect that the sentences are to be served without the benefit of parole. SENTENCES AFFIRMED AS AMENDED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.