Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Horton, 28 So. 3d 370.

37 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Dartanya O. Spottsville AKA "Lo" La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Donte C Mitchell La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Walter Dj Thomas La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
App. 5 Cir. 10/27/09), this Court declined to remand the matter for imposition of the mandatory fine due 20-KA-97 14 to the defendant’s indigent status.
State v. Montero 263 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 10/27/09), , 376, this Court declined to remand the matter for imposition of the mandatory fine due to the defendant's indigent status.
State v. Harrell 258 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 10/27/09), , 376.
State v. Allen 247 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 5 Cir. 10/27/09), , 376-77.
State v. Mouton 219 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Norris 207 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Stokes 205 So. 3d 1025 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 10/27/09), ; State v. McGee, 09-102, pp. 11-12 (La.App.
State v. Joseph 205 So. 3d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , -77 ; State v. Norman, 05-794 (La.
State v. Rome 176 So. 3d 721 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
State v. Hayes 173 So. 3d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , -77 ; State v. Norman, 05-794 (La.App.
State v. Wilson 167 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , , this Court declined to remand the matter for imposition of the mandatory fine due to the defendant’s indigent status, noting the following: This Court has the authority to correct an illegally lenient sentence.
State v. Melancon 151 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Henry 138 So. 3d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , , 373 n. 1; State v. Davis, 07-544 (La.App.
State v. Tassin 129 So. 3d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 131 So. 3d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , -78 (citing State v. Allen, 06-778 (La.App.
State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Adams 119 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Gross 110 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Wallace 110 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Shaw 108 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Pollard 106 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Grayson 106 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Dorsey 94 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 10/27/09), , this Court noted defendant’s indigent status and declined to correct an illegally lenient sentence where the district court failed to impose a mandatory fine.
State v. Gorman 88 So. 3d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/27/09), , citing Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct.
State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Johnson 83 So. 3d 1116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Harrche 81 So. 3d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/27/09), , 373 n. 1; State v. Davis, 07-544, p. 3 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles Barfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Barfield 81 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Mouton 78 So. 3d 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/27/09), ; State v. McGee, 09-102, p. 12 (La.App.
State v. McKenzie 61 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
5 Cir. 10/27/09), , this Court declined to remand the matter for imposition of the mandatory fíne due to the defendant’s indigent status.
State v. George 39 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/27/09), , 373 n. 1; State v. Davis, 07-544, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. England 38 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , -77 .
State v. Richardson 33 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/27/09) , , this Court declined to remand the matter for imposition of the mandatory fine due to the defendant’s indigent status, noting the following: | íüThis Court has the authority to correct an illegally lenient sentence.