Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Womack & Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., 316 So. 2d 795.
-
Cory P. Roy and Angie Roy v. Dixie Rv Superstores of Acadiana, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5 The defendants urge, however, that Judge Amy’s dissent in LeGros, finding that the manufacturer and seller were not shown to be solidary obligors, is pertinent to the instant case: In Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Roy v. Dixie RV Superstores of Acadiana, LLC
241 So. 3d 1252
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
The defendants urge, however, that Judge Amy's dissent in LeGros , finding that the manufacturer and seller were not shown to be solidary obligors, is pertinent to the instant case: *1256 In Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc. , (La.App.
-
Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Oil Country Tubular Corporation
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
See also Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Justiss Oil Co. v. Oil Country Tubular Corp.
216 So. 3d 346
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See also Womack and Adcock v. SM Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC
984 So. 2d 685
La. 2008
See also Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC
953 So. 2d 856
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Kelly G. Aucoin v. Southern Quality Homes, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 “When the thing sold contains a redhibitory defect, the manufacturer and the seller are solidarily liable to the buyer for a return of the purchase price.” Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
- Gradney v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc. 900 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- John E. Gradney, Jr. v. Chandelier Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Bearly v. Brunswick Mercury Marine Div.
888 So. 2d 309
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Mike Legros v. Arc Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
This holding by the supreme court was later relied upon by the First Circuit in Womack and Adcock v. 3m Business Products Sales, Inc., et al, (La.App.
-
LeGros v. ARC Services, Inc.
867 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
This holding by the supreme court was later relied upon by the First Circuit in Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., et al., (La.App.
-
McNeely v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.
763 So. 2d 659
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
1974); Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Jackson v. Slidell Nissan
693 So. 2d 1257
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Tardo v. Seither
452 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc.), (La.App.
-
Starwood v. Taylor
434 So. 2d 1236
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1974); Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cox v. Lanier Business Products, Inc.
423 So. 2d 690
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
2520, 2521, 2530; Womack and Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.
-
Slagle v. Morgan
410 So. 2d 371
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
See Womack & Adcock v. 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., (La.App.