Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies Inc., 321 So. 2d 844.

27 citing documents.

Schexnayder v. Bridges 190 So. 3d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
1st Cir.), writ denied, Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Nicholls College Foundation 592 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
App. 1 Cir.1989); Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Petitto v. McMichael 588 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Bordelon v. Drake 578 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
4 Cir.1986) ] supra; Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Fabacher v. Laborde, McCauley & Wilson, Anesthesiologists 563 So. 2d 1305 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
5th Cir.1982) and Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
White v. McCoy 552 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
CNG Producing Co. v. Sooner Pipe & Supply, supra; (La.App.
Combs v. Hartford Ins. Co. 544 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Wilson v. Wilson 542 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.
Burk v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 529 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Dawson v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. 517 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.
Schoonmaker v. Capital Towing Co. 512 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 1793 (C); Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.
Anderson v. Fowler Trucking, Inc. 506 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.
Hill v. Lamulle 506 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Anderson v. Rabb 484 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1631, 1632; Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Fontenot v. F. Hollier & Sons 478 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Lee v. K-Mart Corp. 483 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Collins v. Christophe 479 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 458 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
App.3rd Cir.1981), writ denied Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 436 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The purpose of the requirement that the grounds for each objection be stated is obviously to afford the trial court opportunity to reweigh its refusal in the light of the merits, if any, of the grounds advanced by counsel making the objection.” Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Baltzar v. Missouri Pac. RR 406 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Broussard v. Pennsylvania Millers Mut. Ins. Co. 398 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Esta v. Dover Corp. 385 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In the case of Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
American Bank & Trust Co. of Houma v. Deroche 357 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
471 , (1962), Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Geisler v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 346 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
See: Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc., (La.App.
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc. 325 So. 2d 279 La. 1976
Lea v. Baumann Surgical Supplies, Inc. 325 So. 2d 279 La. 1976