Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite LaGraize v. Bickham, 391 So. 2d 1185.
- Brett Lirette v. Jason C. Adams, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Geico Casualty Company & Axis Ventures, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
- Jones v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 993 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
- Griffin v. International Ins. Co. 727 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- Futch v. Attwood 698 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- State ex rel. Department of Social Services ex rel. Harden v. Southern Baptist Hospital 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 663 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
- American Motorist Ins. Co. v. American Rent-All, Inc. 617 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
-
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith
609 So. 2d 809
La. 1992
Moreover, pre-Brooks, at least two lower courts extended Fontenot to weekly compensation benefits: (La.App.
- Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 593 So. 2d 634 La. 1992
- Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 560 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
- Brooks v. Chicola 514 So. 2d 7 La. 1987
- Brooks v. Chicola 503 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Huber v. Huber 499 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
-
Gagnet v. Zummo
487 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Appellees, on the other hand, argue that the deposit is a valid mechanism to suspend judicial interest, (La.App.
- Senac v. Sandefer 405 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981