Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaffe v. Stubbs, 37 La. Ann. 656.

5 citing documents.

First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. Crawford 455 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
See, Natchitoches Motor Co., Inc., v. Campbell, 17 La.App.
Well v. Sabine State Bank & Trust Co. 138 So. 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
2 C. J. Agency, §§ 204, 210.
Natchitoches Motor Co. v. Campbell 136 So. 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
It is his right and duty to inquire into and ascertain the nature and extent of the powers of the agent and to determine whether the act or contract about to be consummated comes within the province of the agency and will or not bind the principal.” .
Continental Jewelry Co. v. Weilbacher 136 So. 110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1931
Wilder v. Wilder, 89 Ala.
Canovsky v. Bonhage 126 So. 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In Chaffe vs. Stubbs et al., , we find the following: “However much it may be claimed as a legal proposition, that the acts of the agent bind the principal, this can only be truly said when the former acts within the scope of his mandate.