Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Dept. of Highways v. Terrebonne, 349 So. 2d 936.

19 citing documents.

Watts v. Watts 552 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Mayet 521 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
First State Bank & Trust Co. v. SEVEN GABLES CO. 501 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Richard v. Broussard 482 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1981); State, (La.App.
Ross v. Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 479 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hebert v. Neyrey 432 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
3rd Cir.1981); State, *402 (La.App.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT v. Tynes 433 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Van Willet, 386 So.2d at 1029 ; State, (La.App.
D'ANGELO v. Poche 434 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
State of Louisiana through Department of Highways v. Terrebonne, et al., (1st Cir.1977).
Pillow v. Board of Com'rs 425 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1980); State, (La.App.
Jones v. Lee Dautreuil Real Estate & Construction, Inc. 425 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The discretion and role of the trial judge in fixing attorney’s fees is discussed in State, Department of Highways v. Terrebonne, et al., (La.App.
Prentice Oil and Gas Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 421 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Boudreaux 401 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Since his opinion is the only one before the court concerning value in 1979 and since it appears to be based on relevant compara-bles and is realistic in view of the property situation in the South Lafourche area (State, (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf 401 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Parker v. Parker 401 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
9:305; (2d Cir. 1979); (1st Cir. 1977) writ refused .
Matter of Succession of Dunham 393 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State, Department of Highways, v. Terrebonne, (La.
Consolidated Sewerage District of the City of Kenner v. Guenther 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Additionally, we note that “in making awards for attorney’s fees, the trial court is vested with considerable discretion, the exercise of which will not be interfered with save in a case of clear abuse.” (La.App.
CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE DIST. ETC. v. Schulin 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Wexler v. Martin 367 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
627 , ; State Dept. of Highways v. Terrebonne, La.App., , writ denied, La., ; Foreman v. General Elec.
State ex rel. Dept. of Highways v. Terrebonne 351 So. 2d 166 La. 1977