Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kilbourne v. Armstrong, 351 So. 2d 802.

31 citing documents.

Gobert v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 509 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Hodges v. Sentry Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Peters v. Livingston Wood Products, Inc. 486 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Reynolds v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 445 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Edwards v. Hartford Ins. Co. 445 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., supra; (La.App.
Woodard v. Gregory and Cook, Inc. 442 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Orgeron v. Tri-State Road Boring, Inc. 434 So. 2d 65 La. 1983
Field v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 427 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
23:1221(3), an injured workman is partially disabled if, because of his injury, (La.App.
Harrington v. Starline, Inc. 425 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Johnson v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. 422 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Droze v. McCarty Corp. 415 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
As was pointed out by a (La.App.
Dupont v. Ebasco Services, Inc. 411 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
3rd Cir. 1978); (La.App.
Alexander v. DEPARTMENT OF CULTURE, ETC. 410 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 406 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Jacks v. Banister Pipelines America 396 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Case v. K-Mart, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1980); (La.App.
Kelly v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC. 386 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Dickerson v. Taylor 385 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Mayes v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Goodwin v. Stathes 381 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Unlike Kilbourne [v. Armstrong, (La.App.
Simpson v. S. S. Kresge Co. 379 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1st Cir. 1977); (La.App.
McBroom v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 370 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
App. 3rd Cir. 1977), writ denied (La.App.
Conlay v. Houston General Ins. Co. 370 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
3rd Cir. 1979); (La.App.
Dufrene v. St. Charles Parish Police Jury 371 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Simmons v. State Dept. of Transp. 368 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Fazande v. Continental Grain Co. 363 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1977), writ refused, (La.
Barksdale v. Southern Airways, Inc. 365 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Ashworth v. Elton Pickering, Inc. 361 So. 2d 940 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Rachal v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 360 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
In the very recent ease of Lott v. Brennan’s House of Printing, Inc., et al., (4th Cir. 1978), (1st Cir. 1977), indicating that the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit also construes literally the “wages actually earned” provision of the 1975 Amendment.
Lott v. Brennan's House of Printing, Inc. 359 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Rachal v. Highlands Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
[2] To date, we are aware of two other appellate cases interpreting the new disability provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, both being from the First Circuit: (La.App.