Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Taylor, 39 La. Ann. 823.

6 citing documents.

Purvis v. Purvis 162 So. 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
186 ; Succession of Taylor; , 2 So.
Succession of Glover 153 So. 496 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1934
ty, if she had chosen to do so.” In a; syllabus written by the court in that case, it is said that: “Good faith will not be presumed on the part of a mature woman who enters into a marriage with a man whom she knows to be already married, when she has no evidence of a divorce beyond the assertion of the man whom she says she hasi married.” As the Supreme Court pointed out in , 2 So.
Evans v. Eureka Grand Lodge 149 So. 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
The Clendenning and the Patton Cases, quoted from supra, are referred to approvingly in , 2 So.
Prieto v. Succession of Prieto 115 So. 911 La. 1928
Miller v. Wiggins 90 So. 109 La. 1921
Without assuming to legislate, we cannot add to the requirements of the law.” The court, then, cites , 2 South.
Thomas v. Thomas 80 So. 186 La. 1918
With reference to a similar question in , 2 South.