Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Scott v. Continental Insurance Company, 259 So. 2d 391.

23 citing documents.

Joshua Parker v. Lenin Zubia,sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Wille v. Courtney 943 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Floyd Hayden and Lucinda Hayden v. Derreck Spencer D/B/A Derreck Spencer Logging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Hayden v. Spencer 894 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Hewitt v. Safeway Ins. Co. of Louisiana 787 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., , 393-394 *1192 (La.App.
State v. Rabalais 759 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Johnson v. White 693 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Neither does the law require that an agreement to sell a motor vehicle be notarized or even reduced to writing.” (La.App.
Custom Tanks & Welding, Inc. v. State, Department of Public Safety 677 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Samanie v. Samanie 599 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Touchet v. Guidry 550 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Wright v. Barnes 541 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Adams v. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford 533 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Bushnell v. Chaumont 498 So. 2d 1170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
1 Cir.1982), writ den., (La.App.
Cochran Ford, Inc. v. Copeland 499 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Scherer v. Chaisson 469 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Sherman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Banner Chevrolet, Inc. v. Kelt 402 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
App., ; Transportation Equipment Co. v. Dabdoub, La.App., .
Earl v. Commercial U. Ins. Co. 391 So. 2d 934 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Boudreaux v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 385 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Chambers v. United Cab Co. 381 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
the court said: “We recognize that the Certificate of Title is not conclusive proof of ownership, and that proof showing different ownership is admissible.” stated: “The registration of sales of motor vehicles under the Vehicle Certificate of Title Law is an administrative proceeding which does not bear any essential relationship to contracts of sale of motor vehicles.
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Soileau 323 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Dinkins v. Lyons 295 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1967); (La.App.
Daigle v. Chastant 271 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
The Harris case, supra, (La.App.