Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Farr v. Johnson, 308 So. 2d 884.
-
Enriquez v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La.
264 So. 3d 648
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
In Farr v. Johnson , (La.
- Nikolaus v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish 40 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Philip Smith v. University Animal Clinic, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
- Smith v. University Animal Clinic, Inc. 30 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
- Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. 935 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Heard v. Affordable Movers, Inc. 917 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
-
Creel v. Southern Natural Gas Co.
917 So. 2d 491
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-86 (La.App.2d Cir.1975), the court categorized the cases allowing recovery into four general areas: (1) where the property was damaged by an intentional or illegal act; (2) where the property was damaged by acts giving rise to strict or absolute liability; (3) where the property was damaged by activities amountin
-
Kemper v. Don Coleman, Jr., Builder, Inc.
746 So. 2d 11
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Elston, supra ; (La.App.
- Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 715 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- Atwood v. Hylan 685 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Simmons v. BOARD OF COM'RS, BOSSIER LEVEE DISTRICT 624 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Barr v. Smith 598 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Clomon v. Monroe City School Bd. 572 So. 2d 571 La. 1991
-
Frisard v. Eastover Bank for Sav.
572 So. 2d 343
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
In an earlier case relied upon by the appellant, (La.App.
-
Ortego v. First American Title Ins. Co.
569 So. 2d 101
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
writ refused, Dugas v. St.
- McCray v. Abraham 550 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- McDonald v. Illinois Cent. Gulf RR Co. 546 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Phillips v. Town of Many 538 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- Royal Const. Co., Inc. v. Sias 496 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
-
Prather v. Audubon Insurance Co.
488 So. 2d 383
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Minimal worry over damage to one’s property is not a recoverable “damage.” (La.App.
- Hughes v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 485 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dunn 484 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Ard v. Samedan Oil Corp. 475 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Carroll v. State Farm Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Vial v. South Central Bell Telephone 423 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
- Meshell v. Insurance Co. of North America 416 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Dairyland Insurance v. Joseph 412 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
First of Georgia Ins. Co. v. Cohen
398 So. 2d 1209
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1977); (La.App.
- Meyers v. Basso 381 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
-
Elston v. Valley Electric Membership Corp.
381 So. 2d 554
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
this court categorized the cases allowing recovery into four general areas: (1) where the property was damaged by an intentional or illegal act; (2) where the property was damaged by acts giving rise to strict or absolute liability; (3) where the property was damaged by activities amounting to a
- Dugas v. St. Martin Parish Police Jury 351 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
- Hymel v. Tom Alexander Brokerage Co. 348 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
- Farr v. Johnson 310 So. 2d 854 La. 1975