Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., 315 So. 2d 82.
-
Ollis v. Miller
886 So. 2d 1199
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Chaudoir v. Porsche Cars of North America
667 So. 2d 569
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Whether a seller is in bad faith is a question of fact, Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Carpenter v. Lafayette Woodworks, Inc.
653 So. 2d 1187
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
4 Cir.), writ denied, Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Williams v. Chrysler Corp.
530 So. 2d 1214
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
App. 5th Cir.1982); (La.App.
-
Fontenot v. F. Hollier & Sons
478 So. 2d 1379
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Deere and Hollier contend that credit for use is not an affirmative defense, (La.App.
-
Land and Marine Services, Inc. v. Diablo Data Systems, Inc. of Louisiana
471 So. 2d 792
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Wheeler v. Clearview Dodge Sales
462 So. 2d 1298
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(La.1963); Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Jemison v. Greggs
444 So. 2d 183
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Vance v. Emerson
420 So. 2d 1032
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Musemeche v. G & J Mobile Home Ser. & Supplies
425 So. 2d 791
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
In Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Weber v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc.
393 So. 2d 919
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
App. 3rd Cir. 1979); Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.
-
Cobb v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc.
393 So. 2d 402
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Art. 2531, supra; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Co., Inc., (La.App.
-
Peterson v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc.
393 So. 2d 372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
See Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Cassey v. Arnaudville Industries, Inc.
393 So. 2d 215
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
As Judge (now Justice) Dennis stated in Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Associates Financial Services Co., Inc. v. Ryan
382 So. 2d 215
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Article 2531; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Riche v. Krestview Mobile Homes, Inc.
375 So. 2d 133
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
art. 2531; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Harris v. Bardwell
373 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
CC 2546, Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Clinkscales v. Superior Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
365 So. 2d 895
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[10] Muller v. A. K. Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., supra, note 5; Porche v. Robinson Bros., Inc., La.App., ; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., La.App., .
-
White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc.
359 So. 2d 1094
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Compare Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
- Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. 359 So. 2d 607 La. 1978
-
Alexander v. Burroughs Corporation
350 So. 2d 988
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Art. 2520; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc.
-
Guillory v. Pitre Ford Co.
345 So. 2d 1274
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Part of the applicable law is succinctly set forth in the recent case of Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Boudreaux v. Mazda Motors of America, Inc.
347 So. 2d 504
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
2 Cir. 1975, , so that the fundamental presumption and rule ( Farmer v. Fisk, La.1844, 9 Rob.
-
Purvis v. Statewide Trailer Sales, Inc.
339 So. 2d 403
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
See First National Bank of Ruston v. Miller, La.App., ; Weaver v. Fleetwood Homes of Mississippi, La.App., ; Peoples Furniture and Gift v. Carson Hicks/Friedrichs Refrigeration, Inc., La.App., ; Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, La.App., ; Ticheli v. Silmon , above.
-
First National Bank of Ruston v. Miller
329 So. 2d 919
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
See Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Gordon v. General Motors Corp.
323 So. 2d 496
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
1974), Smith v. Max Thieme Chevrolet Co., Inc. et al, (La.App.