Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Whitman, 313 So. 2d 918.

20 citing documents.

Rauch-Milliken International, Inc. v. Halprin 30 So. 3d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 6/26/02) , ; (La.App.
Harry E. Wood & Associates v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana 451 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bitterwolf 401 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1976); State, State, (La.App.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Salles 387 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Namie v. State, Department of Highways 353 So. 2d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
*1099 In State of Louisiana, an expropriation proceeding involving property approximately 150 feet west of plaintiff’s property, we held where the Highway Department had no recorded plat or instrument showing it owned any property beyond the paved portion of the road, its ownership was limited to the paved portion of the r
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Miltenberger 344 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Romano 343 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
The Department argues these fees are excessive and cites several cases, including State, (La.App.
Peevy v. State, Department of Highways 340 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Respectively, these tracts were considered in these appeals: State, Dept, of Highways (1) v. McDonald, (1976); (2) v. Whitman, (1975); (3) v. Bounds, (1975); (4) v. Salter, (1976); (5) v. Oil Mark Corporation, (1975); (6) v. Warner, (1976); (7) v. Kilpatrick, (1976); (8) v. DeJean, (1975).
State, Department of Highways v. McDonald 329 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
NOTES [1] See La.App.2d Cir. cases (1975): State, v. Whitman, v. Bounds, v. DeJean, v. Model Development Corp., v. Oil Mark, (1976) v. Kilpatrick, (1976) [2] Recusation vel non, is interlocutory in nature and may be reviewable on appeal of a final judgment on the merits of the case.
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS v. Westport Development Co., Inc. 332 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
The Department argues these fees are excessive and cites our decisions in State, and State, in support of its argument.
State, Department of Highways v. Kilpatrick 327 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
2d Cir. 1975) writ denied State, (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Shackelford 331 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
See State, writ denied ; and State, writ denied .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Warner 329 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
State, Dept. of Highways v. Oil Mark Corp. 324 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
See State, State, State, State, State
State, Dept. of Highways v. Model Development Corp. 322 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
boro-Hodge before this court where property on the same highway was taken at about the same time as the taking here, the award per square foot, made or approved by this court, was respectively as follows: 2ND CIRCUIT DOCKET NO. OR CITATION AWARD PER AND NAME LOCATION SQUARE FOOT 12,711 Between Jonesboro-Hodge DeJean $ .73 [*] 12,699 Bounds Jonesboro $1.25 Church property Hodge $1.27 Jonesboro Whitman Corner Lot $1.75 Considering the location of the property across from the highway intersection a
State, Department of Highways v. Bounds 319 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
See State of Louisiana, (La.
State, Department of Highways v. Coblentz 322 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
App. 2nd Cir. 1975); State, (La.App.
State, Department of Highways v. DeJean 322 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
A motion to dismiss for identical reasons as advanced herein was filed in State of Louisiana, (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Whitman 319 So. 2d 443 La. 1975
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ethridge 319 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Motions to dismiss, based on contentions identical to those stated above, were recently overruled by this court in State of Louisiana, (La.