Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coignet v. Deubert, 413 So. 2d 253.
- Radlein v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 971 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
- Palomo v. LeBlanc Hyundai Partnership 665 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
- Lemoine v. Hessmer Nursing Home 651 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
- Briscoe v. Briscoe 641 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
- Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. 599 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-
Hanchey v. STATE, DOTD
597 So. 2d 1252
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1975), writ refused (La.App.
-
Dugas v. Frederick
594 So. 2d 1372
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
3d Cir.1975), writ refused (La.App.
- Curry v. Johnson 590 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Ellis v. Dover Elevator Co.
573 So. 2d 576
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
of each person expected to be called as an expert witness at trial, the subject matter on which he is expected to testify, and the substance of his testimony.” In its argument at the hearing on defense counsel’s motion plaintiff cited the court to a decision rendered by this court, (La.App.
-
Sicarelli v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
556 So. 2d 179
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
We agree with our brothers in the First Circuit that: a trial judge is given “great discretion in deciding whether to receive or refuse the offered testimony of witnesses and any bias must be in favor of receiving the testimony.” (La.App.
- Abdon Callais Boat Rentals, Inc. v. LA. P&L CO. 555 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Nu-Lite Electrical Wholesalers, Inc. v. Colonial Electric
527 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-14 (La.App.2d Cir.1987); -56 (La.App.
-
NU-LITE ELEC. WHOLE., INC. v. Colonial Elec.
527 So. 2d 498
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
-14 (La.App.2d Cir.1987); -56 (La.
-
Red v. Taravella
530 So. 2d 1186
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
4th Cir. 1985); (La.App.
- Schwamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. 516 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Bennett v. Sedco Maritime 520 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- Belk v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. 501 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
Anderson v. Visa, Ltd.
478 So. 2d 1346
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Similarly, reasonable questions as to the admissability of evidence should be resolved in favor of receiving such evidence, (La.App.
- Buxton v. Evans 478 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
Perkins v. Certa
469 So. 2d 359
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
4th Cir. 1982); (La.App.
- Lodrigue v. Houma-Terrebonne Airport Commission 450 So. 2d 1004 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Johnson v. Morris
431 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
3d Cir.1975), writ refused (La.App.