Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Britten v. Payne, 381 So. 2d 855.

17 citing documents.

Breck Construction Co. v. Thomas, Farr & Reeves Agency, Inc. 852 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
McManus v. Southern United Fire Insurance 801 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
McManus v. Southern United Fire Ins. 801 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Hickey v. Centenary Oyster House 690 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Kidd v. Independent Fire Ins. Co. 668 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Kinder Mortgage Co. v. Celestine 635 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(4th Cir.1967); Britten v. Payne, [ ], [1st Cir.1980] supra; Board of Trustees, etc. v. St.
Opera Boats, Inc. v. Continental Underwriters, Ltd. 618 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
3003, 3017 and 3018; (La.App.
Durham v. McFarland, Gay and Clay, Inc. 527 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Derouselle v. Konecny 468 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
In support of his contention, (La.App.
Fogg v. Lott 444 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Glenn v. Leaman & Reynolds, Inc. 442 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thus, defendant was in a (1st Cir.1980); Board of Trustees, etc. v. St.
Foster v. American Deposit Ins. Co. 435 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Raymond v. Zeringue 422 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Batiste v. Security Ins. Group 416 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The fundamental distinction in the legal result is that the acts of one procuring insurance as the agent of the insurer are imputable to it, while those of one acting as the agent of the insured, or as a broker, are not; the broker representing the insured for the purpose of procuring the policy, and the insurer only in order to receive and transmit the premium.'" (La.App.
Neustadter v. Bridges 406 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
1st Cir. 1973), (La.App.
Britten v. Payne 384 So. 2d 800 La. 1980
Britten v. Payne 384 So. 2d 800 La. 1980