Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moore v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 364 So. 2d 630.

23 citing documents.

Mark A. Furlow v. Byron E. Trust and PetroChem Operating Company, Inc La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Id., citing Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
Jan Taylor and Jessica Tranette Taylor v. Orr Motors of Shreveport, D/B/A Orr Nissan La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious.” Citing Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
Superior Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
at 1059 (quoting Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Mayehaul Trucking, LLC v. Sasol Chemicals LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
at 1059 (quoting Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Heard, McElroy & Vestal, L.L.C. v. John C. Schmidt and John C. Schmidt Cpa, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
App. 5th Cir. 1985) (observing that to recover under LUTPA a plaintiff must prove “some element of fraud, misrepresentation, deception, or other unethical conduct”); Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.
James Wagner v. DA Exterminating Company of St. Tammany, Inc. and LIPCA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
at 1059 ( quoting Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., ( La.
Phillips v. Patterson Ins. Co. 813 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
However, the definition of unfair or deceptive acts has been left to the courts, (La.App.
Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Bryant v. Sears Consumer Financial Corp. 617 So. 2d 1191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
See Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Bolanos v. Madary 609 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Jones v. Petty 577 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Cook v. Spillers 574 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Berot v. Norcondo Partnership 544 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
Alarcon v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 538 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
However, the definition of unfair or deceptive acts has been left to the courts, (La.App.
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Orkin Exterminating Company, Inc. 528 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
3rd Cir.1979), writ granted , writ dismissed (La.App.
Monroe Med. Clinic v. Hosp. Corp. of Am. 522 So. 2d 1362 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Crown Buick, Inc. v. Bercier 483 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Coffey v. Peoples Mortgage & Loan of Shreveport
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Corbello 482 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
51:1401, et seq authorizes an award to her of attorney's fees, Mrs. Corbello relies on the case of Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Barrios v. Associates Commercial Corp. 481 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Thornton v. Heritage Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n 459 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
we employed the Consumer Protection Law, LRS 51:1405(A) to find a non-judicial repossession by a creditor to be an unfair trade practice, offensive to public policy.
Roustabouts, Inc. v. Hamer 447 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Coffey v. Peoples Mortg. & Loan of Shreveport 408 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
stated that a practice is unfair when it offends established public policy and when the practice is immoral, unethical, oppressive, unscrupulous, or substantially injurious to consumers.
General Inv., Inc. v. Thomas 400 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
(App. 2nd, 1978), the court found that a private individual has a right of action in addition to the right of action granted to the Governor's Consumer Protection Agency through the office of the Attorney General: "The Louisiana statute creating the `Governor's Consumer Protection Agency' and investing the attorney ge