Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richardson v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU, ETC., 393 So. 2d 200.

15 citing documents.

Griffin v. Audubon Ins. Co. 649 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Lima v. Schmidt 595 So. 2d 624 La. 1992
3rd Cir.1984); -3 (La.App.
Landor v. Allstate Ins. Co. 571 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Flowers, supra ; Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau, Etc., (La.App.
Distinguished Farley v. Pat Todd Oil Co., Inc. 544 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Touchet v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 542 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
In this case plaintiff relies on a tacit acknowledgment for the interruption of prescription and argues that this tacit acceptance can be inferred from the facts and circumstances under Flowers and Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau, Etc., (La.App.
Melton v. US Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. 531 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau, et al, (La.App.
St. Romain v. Lambert 521 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Williams v. American Family Mut. Ins. 520 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Flowers, supra; Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau, Etc., (La.App.
Wallace v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 509 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Id.; Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau, Etc., (La.App.
Deville v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Frederick v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co. 467 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Trainer v. Aycock Welding Co. 421 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Collins v. Capital Valve and Fitting Co. 409 So. 2d 579 La. 1982
Co., et al., (1st Cir. 1981).
Collins v. Capital Valve & Fitting, Inc. 402 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1980) and Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, et al, (1st Cir. 1981), the court held that payment jointly to the husband and wife for property damage to the automobile was a tacit acknowledgment of all claims by both plaintiffs.
Richardson v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 398 So. 2d 529 La. 1981