DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruner v. Bruner, 373 So. 2d 971.

32 citing documents.

  • In Re Succession of Horrell 993 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    City of Monroe v. Evans, supra; (La.App.
  • Jarrell v. Jarrell 811 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    3 Cir. 5/3/00) , (paternity action), (La.App.
  • Smith v. Smith 796 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    City of Monroe v. Evans, supra ; (La.App.
  • Skannal v. Skannal 631 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Napoli v. Napoli 543 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Mathews v. Mathews 489 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3rd Cir. 1980), (La.App.
  • Key v. Willard 488 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    1st Cir.1983), writ denied; (La.App.
  • Palmer v. Palmer 476 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2nd Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
  • Kaplan v. Kaplan 463 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Kaplan v. Kaplan 453 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • Wasson v. Wasson 439 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Morris v. Morris 426 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Hamiter v. Hamiter 424 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Hamiter v. Hamiter 419 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
  • Oliver v. Oliver 417 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Matter of Andras 410 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Wilhite v. Wilhite 408 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Appellee contends that the increased payments should begin on the date of the finality of this court's judgment, (La.App.
  • Jordan v. Jordan 408 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Champagne v. Champagne 399 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Woodall v. Woodall 397 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • Parker v. Parker 401 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    9:305; (2d Cir. 1979); (1st Cir. 1977) writ refused .
  • Super v. Super 397 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Hodnett, supra; (La.App.
  • Kriger v. Kriger 397 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Lewis v. Lewis 395 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    alimony pendente lite is terminated by the signing of a final judgment of divorce when the divorce decree makes no mention of future alimony...” (La.App.
  • City of Monroe v. Evans 385 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Local 632 v. City of N. O.
  • Ahlers v. Ahlers 384 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • MacIp v. Wallace 381 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Regardless of our own views on the subject, this court, like the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, (La.App.
  • Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux 383 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    The instant case clearly presents a situation that dictates non-retro-activity on the basis of avoiding “injustice or hardship.” (La.App.
  • Tisby v. Tisby 382 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Having thus concluded, there is no reason to consider the question of the correctness of the trial court’s judgment as to amount
  • Morasco v. Metcalf 381 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Langham v. Langham 381 So. 2d 1284 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
  • Rains v. Rains 376 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979