Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Peterson v. Armstrong, 176 So. 2d 453.

20 citing documents.

  • Parker v. DePriest 666 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Dean v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 518 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    In Peterson v. Armstrong, [ (La.App.
  • DiLeo v. White 391 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Hurston v. Dufour 292 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Peterson v. Armstrong, La.App., , relied upon by appellants in this regard, is inapposite.
  • York v. Sedotal 281 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    App. 2d Cir. 1969) ($12,000); (La.App.
  • Yates v. M & N Constructors, Inc. 238 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Peterson v. Armstrong [La.App., ], cited above.
  • Miller v. Weaver 234 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1970
    App. 1st Cir. 1967); (La.App.
  • Fontenot v. Aetna Insurance Company 225 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    Peterson v. Armstrong, La.App.3rd Cir., , and authorities cited therein.
  • Murry v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    3 Cir., , 458 at footnote 2.
  • Benoit v. Fuselier 195 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    3 Cir., , certiorari denied; Touchet v. Firemen's Insurance Co., La.App.
  • Wilks v. Allstate Insurance Company 195 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    App. 3 Cir., (footnote 2).
  • Distinguished Comeaux v. Miller 195 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    a case heavily relied on by appellant, is distinguishable on its facts.
  • Slocum v. American Casualty Insurance Company 189 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    3 Cir., ; Anno: Liability Insurers—Apportionment, 76 A.L.R.2d 502 ; 7 Am.Jur.
  • State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co. 184 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Peterson v. Armstrong, (La.App., 3 Cir., 1965), , and cases therein cited.
  • Krupp v. Pan Air Corp. 183 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Peterson v. Armstrong, La.App., (1965); Coco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, La.App., (1961).
  • Peterson v. Armstrong 178 So. 2d 658 La. 1965
  • Peterson v. Armstrong 178 So. 2d 658 La. 1965
  • Goss v. Armstrong 176 So. 2d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In the companion appeal rendered this date, , all issues of this appeal have been decided except the plaintiff’s prayer for an increase in the award, and the defendants’ request for a reduction therein.
  • Mogg v. Armstrong 176 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In the companion appeal rendered this date, , all issues of this appeal have been decided except the plaintiff’s prayer for an increase in the award, and the defendants’ request for a reduction therein.
  • Ponselle v. Armstrong 176 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    In the companion appeal rendered this, date, , all issues of this appeal have been decided except the plaintiff’s prayer for an increase in the award, and the defendants’ request for a reduction therein.