Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Branch v. O'BRIEN, 396 So. 2d 1372.

19 citing documents.

Seymour v. ESTATE OF KARP 996 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 *6 Cir.1986), (La.App.
Hull v. Louisiana Indem. 606 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Bonstill v. Avant 576 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
See also, Branch v. O’Brien, (La.App.
Miletello v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 566 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Saffel v. Bamburg 540 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Wyatt v. Robin 509 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In support of his contention, plaintiff cites Branch v. O’Brien, (La.App.
Rodrigue v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 461 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1983), writ denied, Branch v. O’Brien, (La.App.
Rogers v. Ambassador Ins. Co. 452 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The trial judge pointed out that there seemed to be a (La.App.
Sentilles v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 443 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
In rejecting the insured's interpretation of that provision, writ denied (1981): *729 The pro rata paragraph of the "Other Insurance" clause would seem to be applicable because it provides that where the insured has other similar insurance available to him, the highest limits of the available policies govern, and each policy is to bear its p
Duhe v. Maryland Cas. Co. 434 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hampton v. Thomas 433 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Block v. Reliance Ins. Co. 433 So. 2d 1040 La. 1983
Clement v. Continental Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Lindley v. Cardwell 430 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co. 429 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Cole v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 427 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Chiasson v. Whitney 427 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Breaux v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Branch v. O'Brien 400 So. 2d 905 La. 1981