Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Wildeboer, 406 So. 2d 687.

14 citing documents.

In Re: Alr and Bar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In support of this argument, S.R. cites to (La.
In re Alr & Bar 240 So. 3d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
In support of this argument, S.R. cites to In Re Wildeboer , , 690 (La.
In re the Succession of Cobb 710 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hall v. Hall 588 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Burkett v. Property of Douglas 575 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Walker v. Washington 540 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
In re the Succession of Brown 522 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
171 (1st Cir.1930) and (La.App.
Succession of Savoy 511 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
In re McGinnis 508 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
“Service on an absentee may be accomplished through an attorney at law appointed for that purpose who is expressly charged with the duty of exercising reasonable diligence to communicate with the absentee about the pendency and the nature of the proceeding.” (La.
In Re RMK 499 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Hebert v. First Guar. Bank 493 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Chapa v. Chapa 471 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3d Cir.1980); also (La.App.
Lee v. Succession of Chapman 463 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Durr v. Blue 454 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984