Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bloch v. Creditors, 46 La. Ann. 1334.
-
Jones v. Hardy
123 So. 472
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
e work as completed by plaintiff was not a substantial compliance with the contract, and defendant should not be cast for the costs, in view of the power of the court to cast the costs upon the parties as the equities direct (Act No. 229 of 1910), we do not think that the circumstances presented here authorize a variance from the usual rule that the costs follow the judgment (Block vs. Creditors, , 16 So.
- Swift v. Bonvillain 71 So. 849 La. 1916