Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Nale v. Nale, 409 So. 2d 1299.

13 citing documents.

Hicks v. Hicks 488 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
App. 2 Cir.1979), writ denied, (La.App.
Gras v. Gras 489 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Tweedel v. Tweedel 484 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Peyton v. Peyton 457 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
this court recognized several factors involved in determining whether a parent's sexual lifestyle was damaging to the child: 1.
Lake v. Robertson 452 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
1st Cir.1976); , (La.App.
Steagall v. Steagall 442 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Williams v. Williams 431 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
The trial judge specifically found that no impropriety had been conducted within the sight or hearing of the child.” Considering the question of whether a parent’s sexual lifestyle should be a cause for denying child custody, (La.App.
Marlatt v. Marlatt 427 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Murphy v. Murphy 427 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Seymour v. Seymour 423 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Tabor v. Tabor 421 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Duplantis v. Monteaux 412 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
2 Cir. 1979), writ denied, (La.App.
Quinn v. Quinn 412 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982