Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Hearn, 412 So. 2d 692.

14 citing documents.

  • Succession of Ferguson 114 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    In the present case, the petitioner argues that the judgment of possession is null because the submission of affidavits misrepresenting her competency constituted fraud, (La.App.
  • Biggs v. Hatter 91 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
  • Dixon v. Mayeux 705 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Guidry v. Dufrene 687 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    As stated by the Second Circuit in (La.App.
  • Rachal v. Peters 680 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    2d Cir.1981), writ denied; (La.App.
  • Collins v. Baggette 549 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • Miller v. Succession of Cupples 535 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    See West v. Gajdzik, supra (prescriptive period under 3542 suspended where plaintiff did not know and could not have learned by reasonable diligence of her cause of action for reduction); (La.App.
  • Bradford v. Thomas 499 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • Sunseri v. Gilchress 480 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    527 , (1972); Cox v. W. M. Heroman & Co., Inc., writ refused ” (La.App.
  • Succession of Mangle 452 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • Sanders v. Rhodes 452 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Sutherland v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. 428 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Succession of Hearn 415 So. 2d 215 La. 1982
    DIXON, C. J., and MARCUS, J., concur in the denial, La.App., , being of the opinion that the 5 year prescription period began to run from the date of the judgment of possession (Feb.