Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Hearn, 412 So. 2d 692.
-
Succession of Ferguson
114 So. 3d 1260
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In the present case, the petitioner argues that the judgment of possession is null because the submission of affidavits misrepresenting her competency constituted fraud, (La.App.
- Biggs v. Hatter 91 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
- Dixon v. Mayeux 705 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Guidry v. Dufrene
687 So. 2d 1044
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
As stated by the Second Circuit in (La.App.
-
Rachal v. Peters
680 So. 2d 1280
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
2d Cir.1981), writ denied; (La.App.
- Collins v. Baggette 549 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Miller v. Succession of Cupples
535 So. 2d 1185
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
See West v. Gajdzik, supra (prescriptive period under 3542 suspended where plaintiff did not know and could not have learned by reasonable diligence of her cause of action for reduction); (La.App.
- Bradford v. Thomas 499 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Sunseri v. Gilchress
480 So. 2d 1003
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
527 , (1972); Cox v. W. M. Heroman & Co., Inc., writ refused ” (La.App.
- Succession of Mangle 452 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- Sanders v. Rhodes 452 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Sutherland v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. 428 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Succession of Hearn
415 So. 2d 215
La. 1982
DIXON, C. J., and MARCUS, J., concur in the denial, La.App., , being of the opinion that the 5 year prescription period began to run from the date of the judgment of possession (Feb.