Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Whatley v. Whatley, 430 So. 2d 129.

16 citing documents.

West v. West 245 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Whatley v. Whatley , (La.
Jones v. Jones 877 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Hitchens v. Hitchens 873 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Romans v. Romans 799 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Dagley v. Dagley 695 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Martin v. Martin 625 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Widman v. Widman 619 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
2d Cir.1984), writ denied, (La.App.
Ridings v. Ridings 595 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2d Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.
Desormeaux v. Montgomery 576 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
Schelldorf v. Schelldorf 568 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
2d Cir. 1984), writ denied, (La.App.
Wester v. Wester 564 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Mouton v. Mouton 514 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Braswell v. Braswell 494 So. 2d 1333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Kopera v. Kopera 474 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
Johnson v. Johnson 467 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
The time-honored standard for determining whether a modification of alimony penden-te lite is warranted is “change of circumstances.” (La.App.
Creech v. Creech 449 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984