Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., 180 So. 2d 835.

15 citing documents.

Guidry v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Const. Corp. 376 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Lions v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 297 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
In Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., La.App., the Court stated that an employee will be considered to be disabled within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act only if the pain is “substantial, appreciable, considerable, significant, great, true real pain, so intense as to hinder the worker’s fulfillment of his duties, or of such a substantial nature that
Tyler v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. 289 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
2d 122 ; Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., ; Taylor v. Meeker Sugar Cooperative, Inc., La.
Weidert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 247 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Jackson v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. 242 So. 2d 903 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
626 , (1962); , (La.App.
Lantier v. Guy Scroggins, Inc. 223 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Guidry v. Seacoast Products, Inc. 220 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Thornton v. American Mutual Liability Insurance 216 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(Milligan *913 v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, La.App., , and Williams v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Moreau v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., .)
Mouton v. Habetz 215 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Vidrine v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 205 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Milligan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 200 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Defendant relies on the case of Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App., .
Landry v. Central Excavation Co. 196 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
1st Cir. 1953); Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., (La.App.
Cain v. Wilson Warehouse Co. 193 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., La.App.3rd Cir., .
Ragusa v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 190 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
As stated in Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, La.App., : “Under our jurisprudence, a compensation claimant will not be held to be disabled and thus entitled to compensation benefits solely because he suffers some residual pain or discomfort when he attempts to work following a work-connected accident.
Moreau v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 182 So. 2d 661 La. 1966