Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Morgan v. Fuller, 441 So. 2d 290.
- Hornsby v. Bayou Jack Logging 902 So. 2d 361 La. 2005
- Prewitt v. Rodrigues 893 So. 2d 927 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Maxine Hart Prewitt, Interdict v. Malcolm Rodrigues D/B/A Rodrigues & Son Logging La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
-
Cole-Gill v. Moore
862 So. 2d 1197
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
[5] This was previously noted in Morgan v. Fuller (La.App.
- McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co. 847 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Davis v. Culpepper 794 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
-
Sullivan v. Wallace
766 So. 2d 654
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Harmon Wood contends the court was correct in construing the statutory term "the owner" to mean "an owner," or fewer than all of the owners, (La.App.
- Saucier v. Bunkie Wood Products Co. 759 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
- Carroll v. International Paper Co. 649 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- First South Prod. Cr. v. Georgia-Pacific 585 So. 2d 545 La. 1991
- First South Production Credit Ass'n v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. 572 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Evans v. BR Bedsole Timber Contractors 521 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- Williams v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 519 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
Jones v. Don Edwards Timber Co., Inc.
516 So. 2d 1256
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
writ denied , 599 (La.1983).
- McIlwain v. Manville Forest Products Corp. 499 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Crown Zellerbach Corp v. Henderson
483 So. 2d 190
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
1st Cir.1980); Watson v. Big T Timber Co.
- Bulliard v. Delahoussaye 481 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Versai Management, Inc. v. Monticello Forest Products Corp. 479 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Williams v. Baughman
477 So. 2d 734
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Section 8 of Act 169 states that: “The provisions of this Act shall apply to all boundary matters arising under the Civil Code of Louisiana, including those existing on the effective date of this Act; but no provision may be applied to divest already vested rights or to impair the obligation of contracts.” (La.App.
- Dowden v. Security Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985