State v. Holmes
State v. Holmes, 440 So. 2d 1384 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983).
Cited by
Criticized in 1
- State v. Shanes 493 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Counterman 475 So. 2d 336 La. 1985
- State v. McDonald 471 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Holmes 460 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State v. Davis 457 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Hart 457 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Simmons 390 So. 2d 504
- State v. Braxton 428 So. 2d 1153
Opinion text
440 So.2d 1384 (1983) STATE of Louisiana v. Columbus Lee HOLMES. No. 16,082-KH. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. November 10, 1983. David G. Haynes, West Monroe, for defendant. William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, Johnny Carl Parkerson, Dist. Atty., Nancy Gilliland, Asst. Dist. Atty., Monroe, for plaintiff. Before HALL, JASPER E. JONES and NORRIS, JJ. WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. It is the ruling of this court that a motion for an appeal, whether timely or untimely, shall initially be filed in the district court in which the conviction is obtained. La.C. Cr.P. Art. 914; State v. Simmons, 390 So.2d 504 . We decline to follow State v. Braxton, 428 So.2d 1153 . The trial court is ordered to consider petitioner's filings as a motion for an out of time appeal. The trial court is further ordered to make a determination as required by State v. Simmons, supra, to determine if the applicant is entitled to an out of time appeal. If it is established that the defendant did not make a knowledgeable waiver of his right of appeal the district court is ordered to enter an order of appeal.