DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State, Department of Highways v. Gielen, 184 So. 2d 737.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Ransome 392 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Gormley 357 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. James 321 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Lafayette Airport Commission v. Roy 265 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
  • Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Succession of Cashio 246 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    These are factual matters as reflected by the holdings in the cases of State through *292 Department of Highways v. Cenco, Inc., and State through Department of Highways v. Gielen, et al., and numerous other judicial expressions.
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Chesson 229 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    3d Cir., , State, Through Department of Highways v. Crockett, La.App.
  • State v. Jenkins 207 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Bassemier 203 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Cenco, Inc. et al., La.App., (1966) and State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways v. Gielen et al., La.App., (1966).
  • Orleans Parish School Board v. Schuler 200 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    51 , ; State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways v. Gielen, La.App., -739; State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways v. Cenco, Inc., La.App., ; State of Louisiana through the Department of Highways v. Jacques, La.
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jacques 197 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    This case presents solely a question of fact (see State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Cenco Inc., La.App., ; State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. Gielen, La.App., ).
  • City of New Orleans v. Wiener 197 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    See State, (decided by this court April 3, 1967; State Through Department of Highways v. Gielen, La.App., .
  • Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Moore 197 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    In State Department of Highways v. Gielen, La.App., , the Court said: “However, it has long been the practice of Louisiana courts to rely on the expert opinions of those who deal in land transactions in the vicinity of the expropriated land in the absence of comparable sales in order to establish the value of the remaining lands.” No one can tell with absolute certaint
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Henry 192 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    They were of sales of land of much less acreage and not nearly as highly improved pasture land as that of defendant In State of Louisiana, , the Court, in discussing comparables, stated as follows: “Plaintiff very strenuously argues that the testimony of the expert witnesses introduced by the defendant should be disregarded.
  • State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Breedlove 188 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    3 Cir., , we held: “ * * * it has long been the practice of Louisiana courts to rely on the expert opinions of those who deal in land transactions in the vicinity of the expropriated land in the absence of comparable sales in order to establish the value of the remaining land.” We think the opinions expressed by the above men