DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eason, 460 So. 2d 1139.

42 citing documents.

  • State ex rel. W.S. 250 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    (proving that "[a]n intent to deprive the other permanently of whatever may be the subject of the misappropriation or taking is essential"); see also State v. Eason , , 1145 (La.
  • State v. Henry 73 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. James, 36,-493 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; writ denied
  • State v. Daggs 823 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Lincoln 794 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Morris, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Neeley 704 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    State v. Morris, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Golson 658 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Fowlkes 634 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    (La.App.2d Cir.1984), writ denied
  • State v. Gates 630 So. 2d 1345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    2374 , 80 L.Ed.2d 847 (1984); (La.App.
  • State v. Outley 629 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Lankford 626 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Washington 605 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Washington 605 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Spates 588 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Gene 587 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Lee 577 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Randel 573 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Stanford 574 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Hunt 568 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Copes 566 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Christopher 561 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    State v. Wright, supra ; (La.App.
  • State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    State v. Morris, supra; (La.App.
  • State v. Payne 540 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Lewis 535 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    State v. Morris, supra; (La.
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2164 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Higginbotham 522 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    2d Cir.1984); writ denied
  • State v. Morris 521 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Hupp 514 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Cupit 508 So. 2d 996 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    When circumstantial evidence is relied upon, in whole or in part, the court has explained, (La.App.
  • State v. Harrison 505 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    When circumstantial evidence is relied upon to obtain a conviction the court has explained, (La.App.
  • State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    When circumstantial evidence is relied upon, in whole or in part, the court has explained, (La.App.
  • State v. Outlaw 485 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 485 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Fluitt 482 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    When circumstantial evidence is relied upon to obtain a *910 (La.App.
  • State v. Buckhalter 480 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    for the proposition that “since this is a circumstantial evidence case, the court must determine whether assuming every fact to be proved that the evidence tends to prove, every reasonable hypothesis of innocence is excluded.” this court recently clarified the standard to be applied in a circumstantial evidence case, stating “the statutory rule [for circumstantial evidence] is not a purely separate test from the Jackson standard.” The Jackson Standard 1 is ultimately still “the objective standar
  • State v. Wright 476 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    *1168 (La.1982); (La.App.
  • State v. Eason 463 So. 2d 1317 La. 1985