Williams v. City of Bastrop
Williams v. City of Bastrop, 458 So. 2d 221 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984).
Cited by
- Mavis S. Stephens v. Paul David Strahan, II, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
- Stephens v. Strahan 62 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
- Oster v. Oster 563 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Riddle v. Simmons 548 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Bankston v. Guzman 537 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Williams v. City of Bastrop 475 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- Williams v. City of Bastrop 464 So. 2d 1389 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Taylor v. Consol. Rail Corp. 391 So. 2d 1351
- Spencer v. Burglass 288 So. 2d 68
Opinion text
458 So.2d 221 (1984) Frank WILLIAMS, et al. v. CITY OF BASTROP, Mayor John S. Bond, and Charles Gladney. No. 16854-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. October 11, 1984. Rehearing Denied October 26, 1984. *222 Jerry L. Jones, Monroe, for appellants. Rankin, Yeldell, Herring & Katz by Stephen J. Katz, Bastrop, for appellees. Before HALL, JASPER E. JONES and SEXTON, JJ. ORDER PER CURIAM. On appellees' motion, the appeal is dismissed. The appeal taken in this case was not only premature in that it was taken before judgment was signed (LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911), the judgment later signed sustaining an exception of no cause of action but granting leave to amend, which does not have the effect of dismissing plaintiffs' suit, is not a final judgment or an interlocutory judgment causing irreparable injury and is not appealable. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083; Taylor v. Consol. Rail Corp., 391 So.2d 1351 (La.App. 4th Cir.1980); Spencer v. Burglass, 288 So.2d 68 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1974). A judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action is not final unless it unconditionally dismisses the suit. Appeal dismissed.