Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Merritt, 185 So. 2d 832.
- Litton v. Ford Motor Co. 554 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
Fruge v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT
536 So. 2d 745
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
Co. v. Merritt [ (La.App.
- Fontenot v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 499 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
- Salles v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Insurance Co. 395 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
-
McGowan v. Guerin
372 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Co. v. Merritt [ , La.App., 3rd Cir. 1966], supra; ” Appellant breached his duty as a motorist in the approach and entrance into the intersection and this breach was a proximate cause of the accident.
- Great American Ins. Co. v. Turnage 339 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Smith v. Robertson 323 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
-
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Wilson
282 So. 2d 745
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1966); Noah v. Employers Liability Ins.
- Robinson v. Millers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of Texas 249 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
-
Ardoin v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.
232 So. 2d 136
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
“(2) FLASHING YELLOW OR AMBER (CAUTION SIGNAL) — When a yellow lens is illuminated with rapid intermittent flashes, drivers of vehicles may proceed through or past such signal only with caution.” In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Merritt, La.App., (3rd Cir.1966) we considered the duty of care of a motorist confronted with a flashing amber light.
- Collins v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 227 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
-
Trouth v. Allstate Insurance
221 So. 2d 555
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
we construed the above quoted statutory provisions, in a very similar factual situation, and held as follows: “ * * * A motorist on a favored street who approaches an intersection which is controlled by a yellow flashing traffic light is under a duty to exercise a greater degree of vigilance a
-
Neal v. Weaver
220 So. 2d 751
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1st Cir. 1965); (La.App.
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 212 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 212 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Lockhart v. McInnis-Peterson Chevrolet, Inc. 205 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Pederson v. Schenck 204 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
- Southall v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 203 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
-
Thibodaux v. Potomac Insurance Company
201 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
The appellant relies mainly on the following cases: Granata v. Simpson, La.App., ; State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Merritt, La.App., ; Savoy v. Cooley, La.App., .