Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Adams, 493 So. 2d 835.
-
State v. Coleman
756 So. 2d 1218
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2d Cir.1986); the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, State *1248 v. Adams, (La.App.
-
State v. Adkins
721 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
2 Cir. 12/11/96), ; (La.App.
- State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
-
State v. Jackson
707 So. 2d 990
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
These include the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, (La.App.
-
State v. Stacy
686 So. 2d 949
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
The factors frequently considered include the defendant’s criminal history, State v. Ortego, supra; the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, (La.
-
State v. Smith
651 So. 2d 890
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
2d Cir.1986), the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, (La.App.
-
State ex rel. TLV
643 So. 2d 290
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
All factors are to be considered, including the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, (La.App.
-
State v. Pickett
628 So. 2d 1333
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
2d Cir.1986); the gravity or dangerousness of the offense, (La.App.
-
State v. Strother
606 So. 2d 891
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
2d Cir.1986)); the gravity of the thefts ( (La.
- State v. Smith 557 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Davis 528 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Adams
496 So. 2d 355
La. 1986
Prior report: La.App., .