Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Tayco Foods, 475 So. 2d 65.
- Kadlec v. Louisiana Tech University 208 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
-
Turner v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
785 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
2d Cir.1991), writ denied, Hall, supra; (La.App.
-
Hardman v. Kroger Co.
775 So. 2d 1093
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2d Cir.1991), writ denied, Hall, supra; (La.App.
- Ward v. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc. 739 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Simmons v. City of Monroe 588 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
Tannehill v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
588 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
writ denied, , we recognized that a storekeeper is not responsible for keeping his store completely dry of tracked-in rainwater, and stated that each slip and fall case must be decided on its own circumstances.
-
Gray v. Louisiana Downs
585 So. 2d 1238
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
The Gray court further observed that, since a storekeeper is under no duty to take extraordinary care to keep his floors and passageways completely dry of tracked-in water, (La.App.
- Stockwell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific 583 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Estes v. Kroger Co.
556 So. 2d 240
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
App. 2d Cir.1986); (La.App.
-
Dickson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
535 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Brown v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc., supra; writ denied.
- McCardie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 504 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- Sellers v. Caddo Parish Com'n 503 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
Hall v. Kroger Co.
499 So. 2d 469
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
writ denied, involving similar factual circumstances, we pointed out: "The high duty of a storeowner is twofold, first to discover unreasonably dangerous conditions, and secondly, to take reasonable steps to prevent injury resulting from the unreasonably dangerous conditi
- Davis v. Winningham Datsun-Volvo, Inc. 493 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Johnson v. Tayco Foods
478 So. 2d 149
La. 1985
Prior report: La.App., .