DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Plauche-Locke Securities, Inc. v. Johnson, 187 So. 2d 178.

13 citing documents.

  • Bordelon v. Sayer 811 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • American Bank & Trust Co. v. Price 688 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    There is no requirement in the law that the appraisers be “disinterested persons.” (La.App.
  • Sellers v. Sellers 660 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    3 Cir.1987); Plauche-Locke Securities, (La.App.
  • John Deere Co. v. Loewer 505 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    In Plauche-Locke Securities, (La.App.
  • State v. Myles 432 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    See, e.g. Plauche-Locke Securities, wherein the court described the NADA "blue book" as "...
  • Ardoin v. Fontenot 374 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    He argues that that statement in the proces verbal is sufficient to establish substantial compliance with the statutory requirements under this court's holding in Plauche-Locke Securities, (La.
  • Neely v. State, Dept. of Public Safety, Drivers License Div. 308 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    In Plauche-Locke Securities, (La.App.
  • State v. Snyder 304 So. 2d 334 La. 1974
    App.2d 79 , 181 N.E.2d 742 (1962); Plauche-Locke Securities, Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee, 164 So.
  • Ford Motor Credit Company v. Blackwell 295 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Neither appraiser ever physically inspected the vehicle and while in itself, this may not be fatal to the validity of their procedure, [ in which one of the appraisers had not seen the vehicle seized], in the light of defendant's testimony that the vehicle had extra equipment installed on it and that the condition of the vehicle was better than average, their failure to inspect the vehicle rendered them incapable of contradicting
  • Stockman v. Money, Inc. 277 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    ( 63 So.2d at 885 ) See also: Plauche-Locke Securities, (3rd La.App.1966).
  • Associates Discount Corporation v. Bankston 246 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    "The case of Plauche-Locke Securities, Inc. v. Johnson, La.App., decided by our Brothers of the Third Circuit is likewise in point.
  • Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. v. Causey 210 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    ent, yet, on the other hand, where there has been a substantial compliance with the law in regard to the appraisement and a just and fair appraisement has been made, as in this case, then certainly the court should not hold that the sale was without benefit of appraisement for highly technical reasons, as presented in this case.” *88 The case of Plauche-Locke Securities, Inc. v. Johnson, La.App., decided by our Brothers of the Third Circuit is likewise in point.
  • Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. Guercio 200 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Considering an exact factual situation in which an appraiser was an employee of plaintiff corporation in Plauche-Locke Securities, Inc. v. Johnson, La.App., , the court held the law contemplates that even a party to the litigation may act as an appraiser considering the appraisal statute LSA-R.S.