DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 188 So. 2d 432.

8 citing documents.

  • Chevalier v. Bossier 663 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    239 , ; Richard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Williams v. Red Barn Chemicals, Inc., La.App., ; 3 Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, s 78.45, pp. 107-108.
  • Johnson v. Morton Salt Co. 377 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
  • Williams v. International Lubricant Corp. 341 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    Co., cited in the reasons for judgment in this case, the trial court found as a fact that the personnel supervisor had explained at plaintiff's request the difference in benefits after payment was commenced.
  • Bell v. Gulf Insurance Company 313 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Ryder v. Insurance Company of North America 282 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Distinguished Blanchard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 280 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Price v. Gas & Well Operating Service 267 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    239 , ; Richard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Williams v. Red Barn Chemicals, Inc., La.App., ; 3 Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 78.45, pp. 107-108.” The Dupaquier case is particularly applicable here since under its facts there was no deliberate or intentional misrepresentation by the employer for the purpose of lulling plaintiff into not f
  • Dupaquier v. City of New Orleans 257 So. 2d 385 La. 1972
    239 , ; Richard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., ; Williams v. Red Barn Chemicals, Inc., La.App., ; 3 Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 78.45, pp. 107-108.