Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ruff, 504 So. 2d 72.

36 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Heard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Ellis, supra, (La.App.
State v. Heard 258 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Ellis, supra , citing State v. Lombard , ; State v. Ruff , (La.App.
State v. Wills 125 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
See State v. Lombard, supra, (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Bryce Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Ellis, supra, (La.App.
State v. Perkins 85 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Ellis, supra, (La.App.
State v. Horn 55 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Jones 46 So. 3d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
See State v. Lombard, supra, (La.App.
State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Ellis, supra , (La.App.
State v. O'NEAL 976 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Ellis 961 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste 947 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Mitchell 889 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
State v. Lemons 870 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
See State v. Lombard, supra, (La.App.
State v. Brooks 839 So. 2d 1075 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
See State v. Lombard, supra , (La.App.
State v. Rodriguez 822 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
That is a quote from State versus Ruff, R-U-F-F-, at page 78 [(La.App.
State v. Chism 821 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Jackson v. Vir ginia, supra; State v. Hudson, supra; (La.App.
State v. Hudson 760 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Jackson v. Virginia, supra ; (La.App.
State in Interest of DS 694 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Lewis 685 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Jasper 677 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
That portion of the instruction referring to the possibility of escape in determining whether the defendant had a (La.
State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Clark 643 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Stewart 641 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. McCray 621 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Taylor 621 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Jackson v. Virginia, supra; (La.App.
State v. Lindsey 621 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
writ denied , 65 (La.1987), a reviewing court must consider a defendant's insufficiency of evidence claim even though he successfully proves a Brady violation.
State v. Braswell 605 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
writs denied , 65 (1987).
State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
It was far milder than the provocative acts held to be mitigating in recent cases such as State v. Lombard, supra, (La.App.
State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Freeman 521 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
State v. Stevenson 514 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Ruff 508 So. 2d 65 La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .
State v. Ruff 508 So. 2d 64 La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .