Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Zihlavsky, 505 So. 2d 761.

21 citing documents.

State v. Bridges 251 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
1989) ; State v. Zihlavsky , (La.
State of Louisiana v. Jimmie Breaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. C.M. 128 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State in the Interest of Metoyer, supra; (La.App.
State v. Johnson 109 So. 3d 994 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 3/10/99) , ; (La.App.
State v. Gibson 38 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 3/10/99) , ; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
no requirement that the proof of age be established by direct evidence.” -65 (La.App.
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Ware 959 So. 2d 459 La. 2007
See State v. Stewart, 00-2960, p. 7 (La.3/15/02), (citing 4 J. Wigmore, Evidence, § 1157 (Chadborne rev.1972) for the principle of autoptic proference, or things proved by the self-perception of the tribunal); (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Glenn Teague La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
no requirement that the proof of age be established by direct evidence.” -65 (La.App.
State v. Teague 893 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
5 Cir. 3/10/99) , ; (La.App.
State v. Day 735 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Lewis 727 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Holmes 709 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
2 Cir.), writ denied, (La.App.
State v. Borne 691 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Guidry 651 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
State v. Brown 627 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Fontenot 616 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Francis 560 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Distinguished State v. Shelton 545 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Zihlavsky 511 So. 2d 1152 La. 1987
Prior report: La.App., .