Cited by

13 citing documents.

General Elec. Co. v. Dugas 526 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Fontenot v. Hanover Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Smith v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Jones v. Gentilly Dodge, Inc. 397 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Weil v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 323 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Acrey v. Cotton Bros. Baking Co. 255 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Invest, Incorporated v. State 247 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Langley v. Copolymer Rubber & Chemical Corp. 233 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Carl Heck Engineers, Inc. v. Daigle 219 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
The trial judge also held that under the facts of this case CCP Article 697 and the case of Younger v. American Radiator and Standard Sanitary Corporation, et al, La.App., are controlling and dispositive of the issue of whether or not Heck could in fact assert the claim of $2150.00.
American Security Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North America 220 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Mount Beacon Insurance v. Mills 205 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Art. 697 they *146 were required to prosecute their claims as joint plaintiffs in one action.” [ ] See also McDaniel v. Hearn, La.App., (2nd Cir.1963) and Younger v. American Radiator, etc., La.App., (3rd Cir.1967).
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill 201 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Younger v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp. 195 So. 2d 644 La. 1967