Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Graham, 513 So. 2d 419.
- State v. Hall 794 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. Burford 738 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- State v. Sudds 730 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
- Explained State v. Reynolds 716 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
- State v. Orozco 609 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Explained State v. Barrio 608 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Mashaw 554 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Mims 552 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Sepulvado 549 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Watts
550 So. 2d 711
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Smith, supra; (La.App.
- State v. Whitaker 543 So. 2d 1073 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Taylor 535 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
-
State v. Arnold
533 So. 2d 1311
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
l policy of Louisiana to exclude polygraph evidence in criminal trials, State v. Catanese, supra , although polygraph evidence has been declared admissible in post-trial proceedings, within judicial discretion, where guilt or innocence is not an issue, State v. Catanese, supra and, within judicial discretion, in sentencing proceedings, (La.App.
-
State v. Oubre
524 So. 2d 221
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
As the defendant was represented by counsel and replied that he fully understood his exposure, (La.App.