Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans, 178 So. 2d 312.

31 citing documents.

Lingoni v. Hibernia National Bank 33 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Borne v. King 799 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Dumas and Associates, Inc. v. Lewis Enterprises Inc. 704 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
The court also held [ (La.
McKeen Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Oliver 586 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
App.2d Cir.1981); (La.App.
Conmaco, Inc. v. Southern Ocean Corp. 581 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Carter v. Deitz 556 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
4th Cir. 1986); (La.App.
Morrison v. JA Jones Const. Co., Inc. 537 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
App. 1st Cir.1983); (La.App.
MJ Womack, Inc. v. State House of Rep. 509 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Sams v. Kendall Const. Co. 499 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
(emphasis added) (footnotes omitted) To establish the standards of care and skill against which an architect's performance is judged, (La.App.
Bowman v. Coursey 433 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hogan Exploration v. Monroe Engineer. Assoc. 430 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1968); Pittman Construction Co., (La.App.
City of Covington v. Heard 428 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
1st Cir. 1968): "The test of liability of one employed to render professional services on the ground that he has been deficient or remiss in the performance of such services is well stated in Pittman Construction Co., Inc. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., , from which we quote with approval the following: `In determining the liability of Godat, the same standard of care applied in the case of architects, physicians, attorneys, and others engaged in professions requiring the exercise of technical
Segall Co., Inc. v. WD Glassell Co. 401 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Am. Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pavia-Byrne Engineering Corp. 393 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
This test has been applied to engineers in Pittman Construction v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; to architects in Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., La.App., ; to surveyors in Charles Carter & Co. v. McGee, La.App., ; to beauticians in Mixon v. Brechtel, La.App., 174 So.
Vitenas v. Centanni 381 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
The principles of this statute have been applied by us in the cases of Pittman Construction Company, (La.App.
Gretna Glass & Mirror Works, Inc. v. Crescent City Baptist Church 357 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
See LeBreton v. Brown, La.App., ; Sisters of the Good Shepherd v. Quinn Const. Co., La.App., ; Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; and also LSA-R.S.
Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Carey Hodges & Associates, Inc. 358 So. 2d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1968), and Pittman Construction Company, (La.App.
Charles Carter & Co., Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge 344 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
" (4th Cir. 1965), writs refused.
Ortego v. State Bank & Trust Co. of Golden Meadow 316 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(4th La.App., 1965), writs refused, 248 La.
Alumaglass Corp. v. Adm'x of Succession of Kendrick 303 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Gross v. South-coast Contractors, Inc., La.App., .
Town of Winnsboro v. Barnard & Burk, Inc. 294 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Lebreton v. Brown 260 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
4th Cir. 1969); (La.App.
Katz v. Judice 252 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
4th Cir. 1969); (La.App.
Calandro Development, Inc. v. RM Butler Contr., Inc. 249 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
This test has been applied to engineers in Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; to architects in Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., La.App., ; to surveyors in Charles Carter & Co. v. McGee, La.App., ; to beauticians in Mixon v. Brechtel, La.App., 174 So.
Sisters of the Good Shepherd v. Quinn Const. Co. 225 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
Pittman Construction Company v. City of New Orleans, La.App., (1965).
Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc. 224 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
[9] Pittman Construction Company v. City of New Orleans, La.App., (1965).
Washington Parish Police Jury v. Belcher & Son, Inc. 215 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
In the case of Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., , referring to R.S.
Charles Carter & Company v. McGee 213 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
The test of liability of one employed to render professional services on the ground that he has been deficient or remiss in the performance of such services is well stated in Pittman Construction Co., Inc. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., , from which we quote with approval the following: "In determining the liability of Godat, the same standard of care applied in the case of architects, physicians, attorneys, and others engaged in professions requiring the exercise of technical skill should be
Pittman Construction Co. v. City of New Orleans 179 So. 2d 274 La. 1965