Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 513 So. 2d 438.
- State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- State v. Garcia 26 So. 3d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
-
State v. Marshall
6 So. 3d 1051
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1404 , 158 L.Ed.2d 90 (2004); (La.App.
-
State v. White
968 So. 2d 901
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 9/18/02), ; (La.App.
- State v. Arnold 970 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
- State v. Scroggins 926 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Durden
842 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
14:24; State v. Allen, 36,180 (La.App.2d Cir.09/18/02), ; (La.App.
- State v. Allen 828 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Logan 822 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Tolliver 818 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Freeman 801 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
- State v. Saylor 802 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- State v. Texada 734 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Cayton 721 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- State v. Winn 705 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State v. Stepp 686 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- State v. Langley 680 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- State v. Pratt 671 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
- State v. Doucet 638 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- State v. Welch 615 So. 2d 300 La. 1993
- State v. Bellamy 599 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- State v. Moseley 587 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
-
State v. Stanford
574 So. 2d 443
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
15:438 does “not establish a stricter standard of review than the more general reasonable juror’s reasonable doubt formula, it emphasizes the need for careful observation of the usual standard, and provides a helpful methodology for its implementation in cases which hinge on the evaluation of circumstantial evidence.” (La.App.
- State v. Driggers 554 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Jackson 545 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989