No. 1906
Precedential
Processed
Kathman v. Walters
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 3d Cir., June 6, 1967 197 So. 2d 715; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., July 15, 1965 177 So. 2d 393
Kathman v. Walters, 22 La. Ann. 54 (1870).
Cited by
- Rosenblath v. Sanders 91 So. 252 La. 1922
- Campbell v. Gullo 78 So. 124 La. 1918
Opinion text
Howe, J. We find no reason to disturb the judgment of the District Court in this case. The allegation that the claim of the intervenor for rent was founded upon a contract reprobated by law — the hiring of a house to be used as a brothel — seems to be sustained by the evidence. The claim for rent was therefore properly rejected. It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from bo affirmed, at the costs of appellant. Chief Justice Ludeling and Justice Wyly absent